2024 U.S. Presidential Race: A Comparative Overview of Nominees
- Sustainable Stillwater MN
- Aug 13, 2024
- 5 min read
Updated: Aug 17, 2024
As the 2024 U.S. Presidential election approaches, voters are faced with distinct choices regarding leadership, particularly concerning energy, environmental issues, and climate change.

Here’s a balanced summary of the key positions held by the Democratic and Republican nominees and their running mates:
Democratic Nominee: Kamala Harris
Should Kamala Harris ascend to the presidency, her tenure promises to bring a transformative approach to climate and environmental issues. Known for her robust climate agenda, Harris has championed the Green New Deal and played a pivotal role in advancing the Inflation Reduction Act. Her administration aims to achieve a 40% reduction in U.S. emissions by 2030, emphasizing a swift transition to renewable energy sources. This commitment could steer the country towards a more sustainable future, fostering innovation in clean energy and fortifying environmental protections.
Harris’s dedication to environmental justice underscores her vision of shielding vulnerable communities from pollution and hazards. Her policies could result in cleaner air and water, tackling health disparities and fostering a healthier environment. By investing in green technologies and creating eco-friendly jobs, Harris’s administration might pave the way for long-term economic and environmental benefits.
Stance on Climate, Energy, and Environmental Issues:
Climate Commitment: Kamala Harris has a long-standing commitment to environmental issues, including creating an environmental justice office and sponsoring the Green New Deal.
Renewable Energy: Harris supports transitioning to renewable energy, including significant funding for electric vehicles and solar panels through the Inflation Reduction Act.
Ending Fossil Fuel Support: She has pledged to end federal support for fossil fuels, ban fracking, and halt new oil leases.
Environmental Justice: Harris has emphasized protecting low-income and minority communities from pollution.
Regulatory Oversight: She supports reversing many of the Trump administration’s rollbacks on environmental regulations.
Global Leadership: Harris has represented the U.S. at international climate summits and links climate investments to economic benefits.
Legal Actions: She has a record of suing polluters and using executive powers to enforce environmental regulations.
Republican Nominee: Donald J. Trump
Donald J. Trump’s return to the presidency would likely bring a different set of priorities to energy and environmental policies. Known for making the U.S. the world's leading producer of oil and natural gas, Trump’s approach emphasizes lifting restrictions on American energy production and rolling back environmental regulations. His administration would focus on achieving energy independence, with an emphasis on fossil fuels and nuclear energy to drive economic growth and reduce inflation.
Trump’s policies aim to make energy more affordable and abundant, potentially lowering energy costs for American consumers. However, this approach could also accelerate climate change, as increased fossil fuel production and weakened environmental protections might exacerbate environmental challenges. The long-term implications of such policies could include more severe climate-related risks for future generations.
Stance on Climate, Energy, and Environmental Issues:
Increase Domestic Energy Production: Expand oil, gas, and coal production to achieve energy independence, including approving more drilling projects and pipelines.
Deregulate the Energy Sector: Roll back environmental regulations that he views as restrictive to businesses, particularly in the fossil fuel industry.
Withdraw from International Climate Agreements: Reiterate his opposition to agreements like the Paris Climate Accord, possibly pulling the U.S. out of any commitments made under the Biden administration.
Promote Fossil Fuels: Advocate for the continued use of coal, oil, and natural gas as the primary energy sources, downplaying the importance of renewable energy.
Challenge Environmental Policies: Work to reverse climate and environmental policies put in place by previous administrations, including regulations on carbon emissions and protections for endangered species.
Ease Restrictions on Public Lands: Open more public lands for energy exploration and extraction, reducing protections for national parks and wildlife areas.
Prioritize Economic Growth Over Environmental Concerns: Focus on policies that boost economic growth, particularly in the energy sector, even if they come at the expense of environmental protection.
Democratic Running Mate: Tim Walz
As Vice President, Tim Walz’s climate policies could build on his impressive record as Governor of Minnesota, where he led the charge toward 100% clean electricity by 2040. Walz’s focus on clean energy investments and climate action could serve as a model for nationwide initiatives. His experience in state-level climate strategy could contribute to broader national efforts, enhancing environmental sustainability and economic growth through innovative solutions.
Stance on Climate, Energy, and Environmental Issues:
100% Clean Electricity: Walz signed a law requiring Minnesota to produce all its electricity from carbon-free sources by 2040.
Climate Action Framework: He launched a plan in 2022 to reduce pollution and address extreme weather events.
Clean Energy Investments: Under his leadership, Minnesota invested $2 billion in renewable energy projects.
EPA Grants and Recognition: Minnesota received a $200 million grant for climate initiatives under Walz’s administration.
National Engagement: Walz has participated in climate discussions and emphasized sustainable solutions through collaboration.
Republican Running Mate: J.D. Vance
J.D. Vance’s perspective on energy and environmental issues mirrors a focus on deregulation and skepticism about climate change. As Vice President, Vance’s policies could prioritize fossil fuel production and reduce environmental regulations. This approach might support short-term economic benefits but could exacerbate long-term environmental challenges, leading to increased climate risks and higher costs for future generations.
Stance on Climate, Energy, and Environmental Issues:
Climate Change Skepticism: Vance argues that climate change concerns are exaggerated and driven by political agendas.
Regulatory Opposition: He opposes many environmental regulations, believing they hinder economic growth.
Energy Policy: Vance supports increased domestic energy production and has introduced legislation to repeal federal tax credits for electric vehicles.
Economic Competitiveness: He emphasizes maintaining U.S. competitiveness with China and supporting domestic technology production.
Environmental Justice Criticism: Vance has criticized environmental justice initiatives for prioritizing environmental concerns over economic growth.
Impact on Stillwater, Minnesota
The future president could significantly impact life in Stillwater, Minnesota, through their stances on climate, energy, and environmental policies.
If Kamala Harris were to become president, her aggressive climate action and support for renewable energy could enhance local efforts in sustainability, potentially benefiting Stillwater through increased federal support for clean energy projects and environmental justice initiatives. Her administration’s focus on reducing emissions and promoting green technologies might align with Stillwater’s own sustainability goals and provide new opportunities for community-based environmental projects.
Conversely, if Donald J. Trump were to return to the presidency, his emphasis on deregulation and fossil fuel production could lead to policies that might affect environmental quality and climate resilience in Stillwater. Increased fossil fuel use and reduced environmental regulations could exacerbate local environmental challenges, such as air and water quality issues. Similarly, if J.D. Vance were to assume the vice presidency, his stance on deregulation and skepticism about climate change might influence federal policies that affect local environmental practices and energy strategies.
Stillwater’s community efforts to address climate change and promote sustainability could face challenges or opportunities depending on the federal administration’s alignment with these priorities.
As you prepare to vote in November, consider how each candidate’s approach to climate and energy will shape the future. Your choice could impact environmental sustainability and resilience, so weigh the long-term effects on our planet and future generations.
2024 Election Dates
AUG 13 Primary Election
SEP 20 Vote by mail or in person: September 20 through November 4
OCT 15 Register in advance by October 15 to save time on Election Day
NOV 5 Election Day
Disclaimer: Sustainable Stillwater MN is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization dedicated to promoting sustainability and environmental stewardship within our community. As a nonpartisan entity, we do not endorse or advocate for any political candidate or party. The information provided in this blog post is intended to offer a balanced overview of the candidates' positions on energy, environmental issues, and climate change to help inform voters. Our goal is to support informed decision-making and encourage civic engagement while remaining neutral on individual political preferences.
The number one thing you can do for the environment is vote at the ballot box.
References:
https://mn.gov/governor/newsroom/press-releases/?id=1055-568998
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/08/06/climate/tim-walz-climate-change.html
https://insideclimatenews.org/news/16072024/trump-environmental-impact/
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/news/e06fa6c5-f05e-4eb0-81a5-2114ab60cbb6
https://www.eenews.net/articles/how-j-d-vance-stacks-up-on-energy-environment-issues/
コメント